User talk:Just a 1itt1e bit further

... because of the errors that it introduced.

First, the trope is not called "No. Shut UP, Hannibal!" It is called "Shut UP, Hannibal". By our Style Guide, only the first title drop should be in boldface -- your adding the word "No" to the boldface goes against that.

Second, you changed "want to" to "wanna". I have no idea why anyone should mention a manufacturer of cannabis-infused gummy candies in this trope, especially when doing so removed the verb from the sentence in question.

The other changes were not errors, but they didn't add anything to the trope, either.

You aren't in trouble -- everyone makes honest mistakes.

@Just a 1itt1e bit further @Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak

Do you think you could find a thumbnail that'd best suit the article for the web series? I'm coming back to it after literal years since last watching it and... can't really decide.

This isn't like, of pressing importance or anything, but I feel like it might be a good idea for your edit summaries to not exceed the length of the actual edits. If you can help it, anyway.

Well, I look at them and they do certainly stand out.

Edit: Sorry for the wait. I'm just...insecure because of what happened to me on TV Tropes.

Another tap on the shoulder to say that, while I know complaining about easily avoidable gaffes in edit summaries is tempting, try to remember that we're dealing with a very old fork of TVTropes here - there's a lot of cruft that simply hasn't been noticed or else wasn't dealt with as soon as possible, and even more active folks are bound to miss things of that nature if they aren't focusing on them specifically (or more likely don't have the time right that moment).

Yes.

Clearing throat, pointing to above.

... please read the entire example for context. You added "when" to a line on Black Comedy‎‎ that already had a date on it.

I've already removed that particular tag.

*woosh* *Face Palm* sorry I'm stupid lol :-)

Someone could at least use the quote thing, but I'm not gonna blame others for it.

(Don't take this the wrong way! That's the last thing I want! Totally not being passive aggressive! Really! Just in case! Trust me!)

edit: I have a track record of things I say being misunderstood. That's why I put my notice there. It sounds fake, but it is genuine, trust me!

edit 2: Misunderstandings are how I fell out of The Other Tropes Wiki.

No worries. You're not in trouble - in fact, it takes real work to get banned here. {If you're interested, How We Do Bans Around Here has the list. "Being misunderstood" isn't on it.)

The idea at the time was me laying a path for Wikipedia-style pages where we listed media released that year or something similar. I don't mind you removing that redlink, just thought I'd answer your question in that summary.

The wiki staff has agreed that you should be promoted to autopatrolled and automoderated. Your edits will no longer require admin approval before they are applied to the wiki. While your contribution history is not extensive, we've noticed that you've concentrated on the unglamorous work of structural and grammar/spelling fixes instead of dropping in the odd example here and there. We can do with more users like you, and we're willing to give you a chance to do more with fewer restrictions.

-- Looney Toons, admin

@Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk @QuestionableSanity @Derivative @SelfCloak