Display title | Worst News Judgment Ever |
Default sort key | Worst News Judgment Ever |
Page length (in bytes) | 72,197 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 110162 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 2 (0 redirects; 2 non-redirects) |
Page image | |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | m>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | WonderBot (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 01:03, 18 August 2023 |
Total number of edits | 17 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded templates (8) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Exhibited by entire newspaper editing teams at our heroes' hometown papers, the Worst News Judgment Ever gets relatively mundane news stories placed in prominent locations (i.e., A1, above the fold, bannered across five or six columns, and with an overblown mug shot). Our heroes have an easy time finding whatever they happen to be looking for, with the use of a Magical Computer that somehow is able to search .jpg versions of the page in question with imprecise, convoluted or irrelevant text strings. That's if they don't simply see the paper in the paper-vending machine; with that sort of placement, you don't even need to buy the paper—it's all in the giant-print headline. |