Display title | Why Fandom Can't Have Nice Things |
Default sort key | Why Fandom Can't Have Nice Things |
Page length (in bytes) | 70,074 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 105426 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 1 (0 redirects; 1 non-redirect) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | m>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | Looney Toons (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 17:38, 3 January 2023 |
Total number of edits | 34 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded templates (6) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Related to Dear Negative Reader and Writer Revolt, Why Fandom Can't Have Nice Things is when someone who is involved in the production of a work and is known for interacting with the fans (by, for example, writing a production blog or answering fandom's questions, or regularly appearing at conventions) becomes much more restrictive about doing so or else stops outright - because, at least in their opinion, some fans are so thick and heavy (and ugly) that their previously fun activity has become a burden and is no longer enjoyable. |