User talk:Molter

Your edit summary for the Styxhexenhammer666 edit was a rant against the creator in question. After doing some research into the person (as much as I or anybody else outside the USA can do), it appears that "Calling him alt-right" is not justified -- he presents as libertarian, not conservative.

Your edit summary for the RationalWiki/YMMV edit was "Updating.", but what you did was completely reverse the meaning of the example that you edited.

These are not updates. These are attempts to silence someone else's opinion, and are against this wiki's core policies (specifically All The Tropes:There is No One True Way). Please note that the policy is "respect other people's opinions", not "respect opinions that you agree with".

If you want to add an opinion, that's fine; All The Tropes:There is No One True Way means you can do that, as long as you don't disrespect other Tropers. Removing an opinion disrespects other Tropers.

If you continue to attempt to suppress opinions that you disagree with, you will quickly find yourself tempbanned, as per All The Tropes:How We Do Bans Around Here.

-- Robkelk, admin

@Molter @Labster @Looney Toons @GethN7 @Robkelk

Further, we do NOT want to be propaganda for any political soapbox. We strive to present facts, without bias, and allow our readers to come to our own conclusions based on those facts, we are not arguing for or against any ideology. Bear that in mind for all future edits.

@Robkelk: Fair enough, for the most part. That said, what I meant by "updating" on the RationalWiki thing was that by "updating" I meant "It's no longer accurate to say that RationalWiki is mostly not Anvilicious." That edit actually was made in good faith, and not intended as a political soapbox (most of the editors of that site have admitted to being leftists).

I will owe up to the StyxHexenHammer666 edit being in mostly bad faith, though.