View source for Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment

{{Useful Notes}}
{{quote|''Ninety-nine percent of the wiki's users are not looking for a fight.''}}

You're editing an article, perhaps on, say, [[Eagle Land|the pop-culture assessment of America]]. On seeing a description of the negative stereotypes that pop up, you decide to add a past President or a media star as an example of where those stereotypes come from.

Five minutes later that example is gone. It vanished as fast as spam. Why did it happen?

It happened because of The '''Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment'''. You stepped on the toes of the vast majority of the wiki, the people who ''really'' want to avoid flamewars. This doesn't mean that 99% of the wikians agree or disagree with your opinion on the past President or celebrity. It just means that 99% do not care for side-issue battles. Or perhaps you posted something that put the wiki at legal risk in one way or another, and the staff had to remove it. 

Wikis are open to editing from all sides, which makes them self-correcting. For the most part ([[troll]]s aside), people want to maintain a peaceful environment. This means that anything that rubs a little ''too'' harshly will be wiped away.

While this wiki is built upon being [[All The Tropes:There Is No Such Thing as Notability|relaxed and carefree]], it is still not a forum.<ref>Granted, we ''have'' [[Special:WikiForum|a forum]]. We're discussing the wiki's content pages here, though.</ref>

When something is posted that stands firmly on one side of a hot-button debate (political bickering being the ''huge'' one, followed closely by religion, with interpretations of [[Mind Screw]]s running a close third), the editing machine will grind it back down or even kill it outright.  And if something potentially libelous regarding a real person gets added to a page, the wiki staff has to step in to protect the wiki from the legal liability that imposes.

If your example was outright deleted instead of whittled away, maybe there is another method of getting your point across without stepping on anyone's toes. Wording is everything. It goes both ways, too: please do not use the [[Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment]] as an excuse to remove a viewpoint that merely goes against your personal beliefs. 

The rule applies to examples in fiction as well as [[Real Life]]. However, there are some tropes that should not have any [[Real Life]] examples at all, no matter how carefully worded. For these particular tropes, the rule is very simple indeed: [[No Real Life Examples, Please]].

See also: [[Internet Backdraft]], [[Ban on Politics]], [[All The Tropes:Flame Bait|Flame Bait]], [[Flame War]], and [[Edit War]].

{{reflist}}
[[Category:Wiki Tropes]]
[[Category:Laws and Formulas]]
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]