| Display title | Music Is Politics/Analysis |
| Default sort key | Music Is Politics/Analysis |
| Page length (in bytes) | 2,786 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 65188 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | prefix>Import Bot |
| Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
| Latest editor | RivetVermin (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 19:50, 7 March 2023 |
| Total number of edits | 3 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Music fans will often give two points for when the music industry became like this. The first is the rise of MTV and music videos in The Eighties, which produced artists like Michael Jackson and Madonna. An artist's image was always important (just ask Elvis Presley, The Beatles, David Bowie...), but the visual medium of music video meant that they and others were defined primarily by their images, rather than just their music. This has been called the start of the music industry's equivalent of the Blockbuster Age of Hollywood, one less about the music and more about the profits—much more than usual, anyway. Of course Your Mileage May Vary, since the music of the era, including the two artists named, is often well-regarded in spite or even because of the focus on image. |