Display title | Unproblematic Prostitution/Analysis |
Default sort key | Unproblematic Prostitution/Analysis |
Page length (in bytes) | 3,433 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 41398 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | prefix>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | Robkelk (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 17:12, 27 October 2018 |
Total number of edits | 5 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Authors dealing with this trope have two negative audience reactions to defend against or ignore. These two positions are very different from each other in some ways, but they both agree that it's dangerous to portray a sex worker in a positive way because you run the risk of Do Not Do This Cool Thing. One position is about seeing sex workers as victims, thus despising the trope Disposable Sex Worker even more than this one. The other position is about seeing sex workers as immoral, thus tending to see the other trope as a valuable aesop instead. |