Display title | Hands in Pockets |
Default sort key | Hands in Pockets |
Page length (in bytes) | 9,190 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 65440 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 1 (0 redirects; 1 non-redirect) |
Page image | |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | prefix>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 17:04, 28 October 2021 |
Total number of edits | 12 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded templates (5) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Strictly speaking, any outright avoidance of the Lazy Artist to actually draw a particular thing. This is usually self-admitted and if it carries an apologetic tone, the implication is that trying to draw a difficult scene element would result making the work uglier. Extremely common with amateur artists. Can get extremely glaring with something the audience is expecting to see; hands, in particular, are often seen to be very difficult to draw. And they are. A hand is a mess of overlapping and foreshortened digits, odd wrinkles, and tendons poking out in the strangest of places - plus, while there are only so many different positions that, say, arms or ears or eyes can assume, hands can be found in an almost infinite variety of poses holding an infinite number of things. And considering people tend to naturally focus on hands, one minor mistake can ruin an entire picture. There are entire sections in art libraries and entire university courses devoted only to hands. |