Display title | Contested Sequel |
Default sort key | Contested Sequel |
Page length (in bytes) | 83,097 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 50535 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 1 (0 redirects; 1 non-redirect) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | prefix>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | Igordebraga (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 01:51, 24 April 2024 |
Total number of edits | 25 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 1 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Transcluded templates (8) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Sometimes there's a Sequel that attempts to address complaints people had with the original, or build upon the original's perceived strengths. Sometimes, in its attempt to do so, though, it may lose track of what made the original so great for many. If that happens, there may be a huge split in the fanbase, with some fans saying that the sequel is an excellent improvement, with others saying that the sequel's improvements aren't worth the other changes made. This can result in large flame wars when someone who prefers the original argues with those who consider the sequel to be superior. |