Turn Based Tactics: Difference between revisions

Everything About Fiction You Never Wanted to Know.
Content added Content deleted
m (Mass update links)
(update links)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{trope}}
{{trope}}
''[[Turn Based Tactics]]'' is a specialized subgenre of [[Turn Based Strategy]]. What makes Tactical games different is their scope; While strategic games (like ''[[Risk]]'' or ''[[Civilization (Video Game)|Civilization]]'') revolve around the abstract mechanics of efficiently waging war, exploiting resources and controlling huge groups of combatants all at once ([[Units Not to Scale|whether or not it's readily apparent]]), tactical games focus on controlling individual soldiers or vehicles. Due to this constricted scope, recruitment and construction take place outside of combat, if they even factor into the game at all.
'''''Turn Based Tactics''''' is a specialized subgenre of [[Turn-Based Strategy]]. What makes Tactical games different is their scope; While strategic games (like ''[[Risk]]'' or ''[[Civilization]]'') revolve around the abstract mechanics of efficiently waging war, exploiting resources and controlling huge groups of combatants all at once ([[Units Not to Scale|whether or not it's readily apparent]]), tactical games focus on controlling individual soldiers or vehicles. Due to this constricted scope, recruitment and construction take place outside of combat, if they even factor into the game at all.


TBT games tend to place a higher worth on individual [[Mook|Mooks]]. To accommodate this, detailed grid maps, status rules like stance or facing and a spot high up the [[Sliding Scale of Turn Realism]] are common. Backing this up, the combatants themselves tend to be modeled in greater statistical detail, with their load-outs, [[Subsystem Damage]] and [[Screw This, I'm Outta Here|morale]]. Unlike Grand Strategy games, Tactical games often put a hard limit the number of units that can be fielded, meaning that if one is lost [[Killed Off for Real|it can never be replaced]].
TBT games tend to place a higher worth on individual [[Mook]]s. To accommodate this, detailed grid maps, status rules like stance or facing and a spot high up the [[Sliding Scale of Turn Realism]] are common. Backing this up, the combatants themselves tend to be modeled in greater statistical detail, with their load-outs, [[Subsystem Damage]] and [[Screw This, I'm Outta Here|morale]]. Unlike Grand Strategy games, Tactical games often put a hard limit the number of units that can be fielded, meaning that if one is lost [[Killed Off for Real|it can never be replaced]].


As with [[Turn Based Strategy]] games, gameplay alternates between players: Each player has the time to contemplate their next move and execute it, before relinquishing control to the next player. There are some exceptions to this, primarily the Simultaneous Turn Resolution (aka "WEGO”) model, in which players formulate and submit their orders for the turn at the same time, and then all soldiers act simultaneously on those orders.
As with [[Turn-Based Strategy]] games, gameplay alternates between players: Each player has the time to contemplate their next move and execute it, before relinquishing control to the next player. There are some exceptions to this, primarily the Simultaneous Turn Resolution (aka "WEGO”) model, in which players formulate and submit their orders for the turn at the same time, and then all soldiers act simultaneously on those orders.


Where Tactical games overlap with [[Role Playing Game|Role Playing Games]], several other similarities may be involved. In particular, the ability to alter units' equipment and to [[Experience Points|gain experience]] (thereby making units stronger as the game progresses).
Where Tactical games overlap with [[Role-Playing Game]]s, several other similarities may be involved. In particular, the ability to alter units' equipment and to [[Experience Points|gain experience]] (thereby making units stronger as the game progresses).


Some TBT games are self-contained: each match or mission is a singular experience, having no influence on subsequent matches. Most however have a Grand Strategy or Adventure portion that serves to "tie" the matches together, with some large-scale goal to strive towards. Even so, the focus is always on the player's performance in each match. Therefore, Strategic success in such games stems from repeated Tactical success, not the other way around. For example, losing an important territory early on in the Strategic portion of the game may make future Tactical matches a little harder, but failing a single Tactical match may cost you the entire game. This is the opposite of Grand Strategy, where one lost battle rarely means [[Game Over]].
Some TBT games are self-contained: each match or mission is a singular experience, having no influence on subsequent matches. Most however have a Grand Strategy or Adventure portion that serves to "tie" the matches together, with some large-scale goal to strive towards. Even so, the focus is always on the player's performance in each match. Therefore, Strategic success in such games stems from repeated Tactical success, not the other way around. For example, losing an important territory early on in the Strategic portion of the game may make future Tactical matches a little harder, but failing a single Tactical match may cost you the entire game. This is the opposite of Grand Strategy, where one lost battle rarely means [[Game Over]].


Since the start of the 21st century, TBT games have been in recession in what was their strongest market: the personal computer. The appearance of computers that could easily process gameplay in [[Real Time]] attracted a large portion of Strategy Game fans towards [[Real Time Strategy]] in one direction, and towards [[Tactical Shooter|Tactical Shooters]] in the other direction. Recent attempts to make TBT games have been based primarily around free online [[Casual Game|casual matches]]. Nonetheless, yesterday's TBT games continue to maintain hard-core supporters who refuse to give up easily. The result is that some of these games are still being played long after they've been abandoned by the mainstream fans. [[X-COM (Video Game)|Some]] even continue to top the all-time-favorite videogame lists, year after year.
Since the start of the 21st century, TBT games have been in recession in what was their strongest market: the personal computer. The appearance of computers that could easily process gameplay in [[Real Time]] attracted a large portion of Strategy Game fans towards [[Real Time Strategy]] in one direction, and towards [[Tactical Shooter]]s in the other direction. Recent attempts to make TBT games have been based primarily around free online [[Casual Game|casual matches]]. Nonetheless, yesterday's TBT games continue to maintain hard-core supporters who refuse to give up easily. The result is that some of these games are still being played long after they've been abandoned by the mainstream fans. [[X-COM (Video Game)|Some]] even continue to top the all-time-favorite videogame lists, year after year.


Compare [[Strategy RPG]].
Compare [[Strategy RPG]].
Line 16: Line 16:


* [[Abomination the Nemesis Project|Abomination: The Nemesis Project]]
* [[Abomination the Nemesis Project|Abomination: The Nemesis Project]]
* ''[[Artillery Duel (Video Game)|Artillery]]'' and its clones -- although the physics-based system, lack of a grid, and the equal importance of tactics and skill make such titles almost more of a turn-based [[Action Game]].
* ''[[Artillery Duel|Artillery]]'' and its clones—although the physics-based system, lack of a grid, and the equal importance of tactics and skill make such titles almost more of a turn-based [[Action Game]].
** ''[[Gunbound]]''
** ''[[Gunbound]]''
** ''[[Pocket Tanks]]''
** ''[[Pocket Tanks]]''
** ''[[Scorched Earth]]''
** ''[[Scorched Earth]]''
** ''[[Worms (Video Game)|Worms]]''
** ''[[Worms]]''
* Some sections of games in the ''Battle Isle'' series, like ''Incubation: Time is Running Out'' and ''The Andosia War''.
* Some sections of games in the ''Battle Isle'' series, like ''Incubation: Time is Running Out'' and ''The Andosia War''.
* The ''[[Combat Mission]]'' series (uses Simultaneous Turn Resolution).
* The ''[[Combat Mission]]'' series (uses Simultaneous Turn Resolution).
* The ''[[Starsiege|Cyberstorm]]'' series
* The ''[[Starsiege|Cyberstorm]]'' series
* ''[[Eternal Eyes]]''
* ''[[Eternal Eyes]]''
* ''[[Fallout (Video Game)|Fallout]]'', ''Fallout 2'', and ''Fallout: Tactics''. In the latter, turn-based mechanics were optional, and could be freely alternated with real-time mechanics.
* ''[[Fallout]]'', ''Fallout 2'', and ''Fallout: Tactics''. In the latter, turn-based mechanics were optional, and could be freely alternated with real-time mechanics.
* ''[[Fire Emblem (Video Game)|Fire Emblem]]''
* ''[[Fire Emblem]]''
* ''[[Ghost Recon (Video Game)|Ghost Recon]]: Shadow Wars''
* ''[[Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon|Ghost Recon]]: Shadow Wars''
* ''[[Heroic Armies Marching]]'', which also combines elements of a card game.
* ''[[Heroic Armies Marching]]'', which also combines elements of a card game.
* ''[[Jagged Alliance]]'' and its sequels. Most of them had plenty of highly-details grand-strategy and role-playing elements woven in.
* ''[[Jagged Alliance]]'' and its sequels. Most of them had plenty of highly-details grand-strategy and role-playing elements woven in.
* ''[[Odium]]''/''Gorky 17''
* ''[[Odium]]''/''Gorky 17''
* ''[[Power Dolls]]''
* ''[[Silent Storm]]''
* ''[[Silent Storm]]''
** ''[[Night Watch (Literature)|Night Watch]]'' and ''[[Day Watch]]'', The Games: Most enjoyment is to be had for fans of the setting who can look past the crippling bugs, but otherwise an excellent idea with a horrible execution, based on ''S2'''s engine.
** ''[[Night Watch (novel)|Night Watch]]'' and ''[[Day Watch]]'', The Games: Most enjoyment is to be had for fans of the setting who can look past the crippling bugs, but otherwise an excellent idea with a horrible execution, based on ''S2'''s engine.
* ''[[Space Rangers]]'', during the space-flight portion of the game (and using simultaneous turn resolution).
* ''[[Space Rangers]]'', during the space-flight portion of the game (and using simultaneous turn resolution).
* ''[[Steambirds]]''
* ''[[Steambirds]]''
* ''[[Steel Panthers (Video Game)|Steel Panthers]]''. The third game in the series [[Units Not to Scale|depicts individual units as platoons (4 tanks or 20-something soldiers) instead of seperate squads and vehicles]].
* ''[[Steel Panthers]]''. The third game in the series [[Units Not to Scale|depicts individual units as platoons (4 tanks or 20-something soldiers) instead of seperate squads and vehicles]].
* A number of ''[[Warhammer 40000 (Tabletop Game)|WH40k]]'' games, like ''Space Crusade'', ''[[Warhammer 40000 Chaos Gate|Chaos Gate]]'', and ''Squad Command''.
* A number of ''[[Warhammer 40,000|WH40k]]'' games, like ''Space Crusade'', ''[[Warhammer 40000 Chaos Gate|Chaos Gate]]'', and ''Squad Command''.
* ''[[X-COM (Video Game)|X-COM]]'' (except [[Fanon Discontinuity|Enforcer, Interceptor, and 2K Marin's XCOM]])
* ''[[X-COM (Video Game)|X-COM]]'' (except [[Fanon Discontinuity|Enforcer, Interceptor, and 2K Marin's XCOM]])
** ''[[Laser Squad]]'', the predecessor to ''X-Com'', and the newer ''Laser Squad: Nemesis'' (using Simultaneous Turn Resolution.)
** ''[[Laser Squad]]'', the predecessor to ''X-Com'', and the newer ''Laser Squad: Nemesis'' (using Simultaneous Turn Resolution.)
** The open source ''[[UFO Alien Invasion]]'' [[Fan Game]]
** The open source ''[[UFO Alien Invasion]]'' [[Fan Game]]
** [[Fan Remake]] ''[[Xenonauts (Video Game)|Xenonauts]]''
** [[Fan Remake]] ''[[Xenonauts]]''


{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Role Playing Game]]
[[Category:Index]]
[[Category:index]]
[[Category:CRPG Tropes]]
[[Category:Turn Based Tactics]]
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Trope]]

Latest revision as of 06:05, 11 April 2017

Turn Based Tactics is a specialized subgenre of Turn-Based Strategy. What makes Tactical games different is their scope; While strategic games (like Risk or Civilization) revolve around the abstract mechanics of efficiently waging war, exploiting resources and controlling huge groups of combatants all at once (whether or not it's readily apparent), tactical games focus on controlling individual soldiers or vehicles. Due to this constricted scope, recruitment and construction take place outside of combat, if they even factor into the game at all.

TBT games tend to place a higher worth on individual Mooks. To accommodate this, detailed grid maps, status rules like stance or facing and a spot high up the Sliding Scale of Turn Realism are common. Backing this up, the combatants themselves tend to be modeled in greater statistical detail, with their load-outs, Subsystem Damage and morale. Unlike Grand Strategy games, Tactical games often put a hard limit the number of units that can be fielded, meaning that if one is lost it can never be replaced.

As with Turn-Based Strategy games, gameplay alternates between players: Each player has the time to contemplate their next move and execute it, before relinquishing control to the next player. There are some exceptions to this, primarily the Simultaneous Turn Resolution (aka "WEGO”) model, in which players formulate and submit their orders for the turn at the same time, and then all soldiers act simultaneously on those orders.

Where Tactical games overlap with Role-Playing Games, several other similarities may be involved. In particular, the ability to alter units' equipment and to gain experience (thereby making units stronger as the game progresses).

Some TBT games are self-contained: each match or mission is a singular experience, having no influence on subsequent matches. Most however have a Grand Strategy or Adventure portion that serves to "tie" the matches together, with some large-scale goal to strive towards. Even so, the focus is always on the player's performance in each match. Therefore, Strategic success in such games stems from repeated Tactical success, not the other way around. For example, losing an important territory early on in the Strategic portion of the game may make future Tactical matches a little harder, but failing a single Tactical match may cost you the entire game. This is the opposite of Grand Strategy, where one lost battle rarely means Game Over.

Since the start of the 21st century, TBT games have been in recession in what was their strongest market: the personal computer. The appearance of computers that could easily process gameplay in Real Time attracted a large portion of Strategy Game fans towards Real Time Strategy in one direction, and towards Tactical Shooters in the other direction. Recent attempts to make TBT games have been based primarily around free online casual matches. Nonetheless, yesterday's TBT games continue to maintain hard-core supporters who refuse to give up easily. The result is that some of these games are still being played long after they've been abandoned by the mainstream fans. Some even continue to top the all-time-favorite videogame lists, year after year.

Compare Strategy RPG.

Examples of Turn Based Tactics include: