The Stepford Wives: Difference between revisions

Everything About Fiction You Never Wanted to Know.
Content added Content deleted
(tropenamer)
mNo edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


{{tropenamer}}
{{tropenamer}}
** [[Stepford Smiler]]: With the remake providing the page image. In the final scene of the original film, all the women have them.
* [[Stepford Smiler]]: With the remake providing the page image. In the final scene of the original film, all the women have them.
*** In the remake, Walter is also one of these, {{spoiler|until he cracks}}.
** In the remake, Walter is also one of these, {{spoiler|until he cracks}}.
** [[Stepford Consumer]]
* [[Stepford Consumer]]
** [[Stepford Snarker]]
* [[Stepford Snarker]]
** [[Stepford Suburbia]]: The empty sterility of American suburbia is a major theme in the original film.
* [[Stepford Suburbia]]: The empty sterility of American suburbia is a major theme in the original film.


{{tropelist|The original film/novel, and its sequels, provide examples of:}}
{{tropelist|The original film/novel, and its sequels, provide examples of:}}

Revision as of 23:31, 17 September 2017

The Stepford Wives started life as a 1972 novel by Ira Levin. In it, Joanna Eberhart, her husband Walter, and their two young children move from New York City to the eponymous Connecticut commuter-town. Joanna becomes friends with fellow new arrival Bobbie Markowe, as the two of them also become more and more concerned with the behavior of the other housewives in Stepford, who are all impossibly beautiful, housework-obsessed and totally submissive towards their husbands, who in turn are all members of the "Men's Association". The novel was successful enough to be made into a movie in 1975; William Goldman's script was fairly faithful to the original, with the major difference being a far more explicit finale showing what was happening to the wives. In both versions, the wives were robot duplicates that replaced the original women after their husbands had them murdered. Both versions of the story had Downer Endings.

While just a modest hit in theaters, the film quickly sprouted a meme in the 1970's, with the term "Stepford Wife" becoming a catchphrase used to describe female homemakers who were sexually repressed and only concerned with domestic chores.

No theatrical sequels were made, but the movie spawned, over the course of two decades, three made-for-TV "sequels": The Revenge of the Stepford Wives, The Stepford Children, and The Stepford Husbands. The lack of Levin and/or Goldman's involvement was painfully obvious, and all three films were also victims of bowdlerization: in Revenge and Husbands, the victims were not killed and replaced but instead merely brainwashed, while Children had the replaced teenager left alive for no readily-apparent reason, allowing in all three cases for a rescue and happy ending.

In 2004, Frank Oz directed a more overtly comedic remake of the original film. The production suffered from severe behind-the-scenes turmoil, including actors walking off the project and some last-minute reshoots. Many viewers found the revelations of the resulting finale to come completely out of left field and contradict the rest of the movie, but as always, Your Mileage May Vary.

The Stepford Wives is the Trope Namer for:
The original film/novel, and its sequels, provide examples of: