Lumper vs. Splitter: Difference between revisions

Everything About Fiction You Never Wanted to Know.
Content added Content deleted
m (Mass update links)
No edit summary
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{trope}}
{{Useful Notes}}
[[File:Lumpers and splitters.png|frame|link=xkcd|Lumping and splitting lumpers and splitters. (Image by Randall Munroe)]]
{{quote| ''"It is good to have hair-splitters and lumpers." -[http://books.google.com/books?id=gHYTAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA105 Charles Darwin]''}}
{{quote|''"It is good to have hair-splitters and lumpers."|[http://books.google.com/books?id{{=}}gHYTAAAAYAAJ&pg{{=}}PA105 Charles Darwin]''}}


When faced with five subtly different things, would you rather see one page with a general description of all five, or five pages precisely describing one entry each? If the first, you're a Lumper. If the second, you're a Splitter.
When faced with five subtly different things, would you rather see one page with a general description of all five, or five pages precisely describing one entry each? If the first, you're a Lumper. If the second, you're a Splitter.
Line 8: Line 9:
A lumper also wants to get rid of this page, but by merging it with a bunch of other pages to create a new page called Common Wiki Wars.
A lumper also wants to get rid of this page, but by merging it with a bunch of other pages to create a new page called Common Wiki Wars.


The way [[Troper|Tropers]] handle this deep philosophical divide is for splitters to write finely-distinct entries and for lumpers to write overview entries that list the "splits". We call those lumper pieces "indexes" or [[Super Trope|Super Tropes]], and each of the splits is a [[Sub Trope]].
The way [[Troper]]s handle this deep philosophical divide is for splitters to write finely-distinct entries and for lumpers to write overview entries that list the "splits". We call those lumper pieces "indexes" or [[Super-Trope|Super Tropes]] (and, on All The Tropes, prefer to put them into Categories), and each of the splits is a [[Sub-Trope]].


[[The Other Wiki]] would not appreciate this. We must never tell them. [[The Other Wiki]] calls these "[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mergism mergist]" and "[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Separatism separatist]" Which, you will note, is a split.
[[The Other Wiki]] would not appreciate this. We must never tell them. [[The Other Wiki]] calls these "[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mergism mergist]" and "[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Separatism separatist]" Which, you will note, is a split.


{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Wiki Tropes]]
[[Category:Wiki Tropes]]
[[Category:Lumper Vs Splitter]]
[[Category:Trope]]

Revision as of 21:14, 2 January 2023


  • Main
  • Wikipedia
  • All Subpages
  • Create New
    /wiki/Lumper vs. Splitterwork
    Lumping and splitting lumpers and splitters. (Image by Randall Munroe)
    "It is good to have hair-splitters and lumpers."

    When faced with five subtly different things, would you rather see one page with a general description of all five, or five pages precisely describing one entry each? If the first, you're a Lumper. If the second, you're a Splitter.

    For example: A Splitter is someone who thinks that this page should not exist. There should be separate pages for Lumper and Splitter.

    A lumper also wants to get rid of this page, but by merging it with a bunch of other pages to create a new page called Common Wiki Wars.

    The way Tropers handle this deep philosophical divide is for splitters to write finely-distinct entries and for lumpers to write overview entries that list the "splits". We call those lumper pieces "indexes" or Super Tropes (and, on All The Tropes, prefer to put them into Categories), and each of the splits is a Sub-Trope.

    The Other Wiki would not appreciate this. We must never tell them. The Other Wiki calls these "mergist" and "separatist" Which, you will note, is a split.