Thread:Forum:Wiki Talk/Analysis pages: what they are for?

Taking a look at the analysis pages, I'm not wondering why they've been ignored so much. I agree that analysis is very important and desirable, but the aim is missing.

I don't even know what an analysis page is supposed to be like:
 * A longer version of the trope description?
 * A shorter version of the Wikipedia article with less NPOV?
 * A school-style essay?

If I want to write more detailed analyses like "Marxist Themes and Allegory in the Circus Arc of the Black Butler Manga" or "Jungian Archetypes in the Second Season of the Black Butler Anime", I suppose I could put them on the analysis page, where they would in all likelihood be preserved for ages, like flies in amber, in a very non-wiki way.

So, I'm not sure what to do. I think some sort of more structured approach would be desirable. Editing normal tropes has a low barrier for entry, as anyone can see add a missing trope or correct a wrong trope. The way the wiki consists of small, disparate pieces makes this possible. Maybe there could be a template or something, with fill-ins like Central Theme, but I don't know how that could work.

I just wanted to raise this issue for conversation.